![]() |
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Expert
Posts: 355
Rep:
![]() |
This may sound silly since earthquakes have been happeing
for millions of years but i was wondering what you all think. The question is, do you think that by removing all the oil from earth, it would make earthquakes worse and worse every year? I was thinking that since earth creates this crude oil, it is for a reason. Maybe if it was left in the ground, oil would help keep earthquakes down to a minimum or ease the effects of an earthquake by allowing the plates of earth to slide by one another without such disastrous effects. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Name: James
Posts: 374
Rep:
![]() |
Interesting hypothesis.
But I thought most of the oil and fossil fuels come from just that, fossils. I mean, if the Earth really "created" oil, then we would never run out, right? I'm not a geologist, but pertaining to the question, I'm not sure just how deep the oil is "buried" within the Earth to make a difference in Earthquake magnitudes and the like. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Conspiracy Expert
Posts: 355
Rep:
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Now that i think about it though, i guess oil wouldn't have much to do with the severity of an earthquake unless the oil pocket is always going to be where the plates rub together. I don't think that's going to happen since the plates keep moving around. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Buff
|
I don't think it would make much of a difference tbh, as the oil pockets aren't underneath the plates but actually inside them. Let me explain with a little diagram:
Basically the oil pockets are inside the plates and not underneath them, ie between the plates and the outer core. So removing the oil shouldn't make a difference in terms of earthquakes. If the oil was between the plates and the outer core, then it wouldn't be there as if would simply burn purely because of the hot temperatures. How removing the oil could cause the Earth's crust to collapse because as they are removing the oil, it is replaced with air, meaning there isn't anything supporting it. Basically the same thing as when a mining shaft collapses. However I'm not sure in the process of removing the oil, so and the oil companies might actually replace the oil with a liquid to combat this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Expert
Posts: 355
Rep:
![]() |
Good post hamesy. Thanks for the picture.
You just verified my final thought on this but i never even gave it a thought about the oil pockets collapsing when the get emptied out. I wonder what would happen if one did collapse. Would we be left with one big sink hole? If it was under a mountain, would the mountain collapse? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Buff
|
I'm not sure what will happen if one does collapse. However I think I saw something on the tv years ago about this problem and the oil companies were trying to come up with solutions. Can't remember what it was called...I might have even dreamt about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Expert
Posts: 355
Rep:
![]() |
I've been looking around but i can't find anything about filling in
an oil well after it has been emptied out. The closest i came to was that in the process of trying to get the oil out of the ground, they usually use water or steam to create pressure to push the crude oil out of the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Conspiracy Buff
Location: California
Name: Paul Davis
Posts: 26
Rep:
![]() |
I'll throw out a different hypothesis for a connection between oil and earthquakes (this one based on snow-pack and geologic activity in the Himalayas).
By pulling oil out of the ground, you reduce the mass of the Earth's crust on top of the mantle for a given location. This gives room for expansion, causing contraction in other areas; thus, movement. Only thing is, there doesn't seem to be a strong correlation (location wise) between heavily drilled areas and earth quakes. It seems about as random as anything else. Japan has huge numbers of quakes yet no oil available for drilling. The middle-east has a number of quakes and lots of oil. In the US, quakes and oil in Cali, oil/no quakes in Texas. Though possible, it's hard to pin down. Maybe it is just one of many contributing factors to earth quakes. Though historically, the number of quakes is decreasing over time.... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|