Was 9-11 a scripted event? - Conspiracy-Forums

**Conspirasist** · 05-12-2008, 01:55 PM

9/11 Scripted Demolition Events
YouTube - 9/11 Scripted Demolition Events

This guy seemed to know how and why the twin towers
fell, even before the firemen did. Who is this clown?
Anwer: A fake witness.
He planted the thought in every americans heads on
what made the towers fall. Intense fire and heat! What
a bunch of hogwash.

Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens
YouTube - Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens

Missles used to destroy twin towers

911 WTC Evidence 3 Missiles NWO Conspiracy Plane
YouTube - 911 WTC Evidence 3 Missiles NWO Conspiracy Plane

Missile hits world trade center!
YouTube - Missile hits world trade center!

Blue Wulf · 05-15-2008, 07:20 PM

I don't think you can script something like that. I mean the passengers on the planes fought back to try to stop them, and unexpected things could happen. So I don't think they can plan a script for it.

**Conspirasist** · 05-15-2008, 08:49 PM

You must be referring to the hijacked planes.

My view on that is that there never was a hijacking.
All the planes involved in the attacks were radio controlled
with no passengers aboard. There never were any hijackers
either. After 9-11, many of the accused hijackers were seen
still alive back in their own country. How do you account for
that?

One flight that was involved "i think it was flight 93 but not sure"
was said to have landed at the cleveland airport in ohio. By the time
it landed, the whole airport had been emptied out of people. The
people on the flight were taken off the plane and ushered into
a nasa building at the airport and that is where the story ends.

I can only assume the same thing happened with the other flights
if they were in flight at that time.

I had read that people believed that building 7 was set up with
radio equipment to guide the 2 radio controlled planes into the twin
towers but there is no actual proof of that since building 7 was
blown up to.

If you need further proof 9-11 was a scripted event, go to you-tube
and find the video about the BBC news showing a supposed live
coverage of building 7 as it fell. It was being reported that building 7
had just fallen but yet it was still there in the video.

When the bbc realized they had jumped the gun and building 7 was
still there, some how they mysteriously had video feed trouble and
had to stop.

If that doesnt convince you then i dont know what will.

It's already been admitted by government officials that 9-11 was an
inside job. I have that posted here to, somewhere.

hamesy · 05-16-2008, 08:27 AM

I haven't had chance to look at the videos in the OP, but there are always going to be people that say that the government would never do such a thing.

In regards to the passengers fighting back, is there actually any proof that this happened? I'm just wondering that if no proof can be found (I haven't had a look for any as I'm currently at work), then how can people say the passengers fought back?

Not sure about building 7, whether if the building contained the radio controllers for the planes, or if it contained the controllers to detonate the towers, but you might want to check out my thread regarding this matter.
Who was behind 911?

**Conspirasist** · 05-16-2008, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hamesy

In regards to the passengers fighting back, is there actually any proof that this happened? I'm just wondering that if no proof can be found (I haven't had a look for any as I'm currently at work), then how can people say the passengers fought back?

No, there isn't any proof that the passengers fought back. There's no
proof that they were even on that flight at the time. The only thing we
have to go on is what the government supplied to the public.

There are some oddities that happened at the time though.

Supposedly, these people made cellphone calls from the plane to their
loved one just before they decided to fight back. Making a cellphone
call at the altitude they were at during the flight is damn near impossible.

Either the call wont go through or it will continually lose its connection.

This was tested by a group of people flying in a small plane. They had
several different cellphones and different cellphone service providers and
for the most part, none of them would work once they reached a certain
height. Take in mind the smaller planes cant reach the altitudes a jet
plane can and even at the heights they were at, the phones didnt work.

So tell me how all these people made cellphone calls to their loved ones
and each call got though with no break-ups.

Todays cellphones may be able to work at higher altitudes now but i'm
not sure. Thing is that now people can get in trouble for using cellphones
while in flight on jet planes.

One guy that supposedly got though to his mother, gave her his full name
like she wouldn't recognize his voice or something. I find that a bit odd.

The whole crash scene is really odd.

The only thing found at the crash site was a hole in the ground. You would
think their would be bodies and plane parts all over that area but there
was nothing.

The coroner at the site was dumb founded because not one body part
could be found. Even Fox News that was at the site was confused. They
expected the same thing but nothing was there.

It's funny that when government officials arrived, they did manage to
find the black box from the crashed plane buried deep in the hole.

Plane parts were found about 3 miles away from the crash site though.
Witnesses say they saw a bright light like an explosion in the sky at the
time and then the sky started dropping plane parts everywhere.

I believe a jet engine was found but it was to small to be used on a jet
plane. The is odd. Same thing happened at the pentagon.

There is you-tube video on this if any of you care to look for it.

CrazyPaul · 06-09-2008, 09:02 PM

If the planes were "radio controlled" then where are the passengers?

Seems like a lot of effort to secretly kidnap people from an airport and send them "somewhere" else to do "something" to them. Especially if your plan calls for them to never be seen from again....

Somehow, I just don't think Bush is smart enough for this one.

As to flight 93, a few phone calls will clear up the "confusion" about no body/plane parts. There were plenty, and plenty of people saw them.

Seriously, why go through the trouble of "faking" a crash so you can put the bodies back? put the parts of the plane back. fill up a warehouse with plane parts afterward. fill up the morgues. coordinating hundreds of co-conspirators.

Seriously, why wouldn't they just be left on the plane? sure as heck would be easier.

The only thing more conflicting than government stories is guys saying, "there was no plane", no wait, the "plane was radio controlled". Well, was there a plane or not?

**Conspirasist** · 06-09-2008, 10:07 PM

The radio controlled planes are just a theory and there is no proof that it happened that way. If there were radio controlled planes used then the theory is that passengers were
put on a different flight that day and the planes used in the attack were radio controlled.

The people i said that were never heard from again, may or may not be true. I personally
never heard what happened to them but i'm not implying they were killed or anything.
They may have just been payed off not to say a word about what happened.

Of course bush isn't smart enough to plan something like that but cheney is.

It would be great if you could find proof of bodies being found and provide links for
us to check out about flight 93. I saw fox news (government owned news) investigating
the site after it happened and they were shocked that there were no bodies to be found,
anywhere.

I never believed the no plane theory. I watched the second one on tv, hit the building.

CrazyPaul · 06-09-2008, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conspirasist

The radio controlled planes are just a theory and there is no proof that it happened that way. If there were radio controlled planes used then the theory is that passengers were
put on a different flight that day and the planes used in the attack were radio controlled.

The people i said that were never heard from again, may or may not be true. I personally
never heard what happened to them but i'm not implying they were killed or anything.
They may have just been payed off not to say a word about what happened.

Of course bush isn't smart enough to plan something like that but cheney is.

It would be great if you could find proof of bodies being found and provide links for
us to check out about flight 93. I saw fox news (government owned news) investigating
the site after it happened and they were shocked that there were no bodies to be found,
anywhere.

I never believed the no plane theory. I watched the second one on tv, hit the building.

Thats a lot of people to buy off and not have a single one squeal. The military couldn't (with best efforts) keep the stealth planes secret in the 80's. Getting a bunch of civilians to keep their much shut has got to be much tougher. Especially those with families.

Fox news loves to play the drama. I wouldn't be surprised if they filmed in the wrong area. They've done it before.

The FAA had hundreds of people picking up pieces of the plane plus contractors driving trucks to transport them.

For flight 93, the Somerset County coroner Wallace Miller (along with local hospital staff), helped collect remains and personal effects. This stuff is just a google away. Most of the bodies were returned to their families.

It's hard to keep a secret between 2 people. Getting thousands to keep quiet for an event that big just seems improbable.

Most of the people involved in the emergency response and cleanup were not federal employees. Making it even more difficult to silence.

Being skeptical is a good thing. Question everything, including the conspiracy theories.

James Lewitzke · 06-10-2008, 06:47 AM

While there's plenty different theories on what really happened, I think it's unfair to lump every single variation together. For example, Official Story believers will argue something like "You CTer's are whack, Bush didn't take the towers down!", which in their case implies that all Conspiracy Theorists believe Bush was responsible, which is simply untrue.

Even if the passengers on the flights were really there, being hijacked, that doesn't mean splinter factions within our government couldn't still be responsible. For all we know, the 19 hijackers could have been government employees themselves, carrying out U.S. orders, and not Bin Laden's.

All I'm saying here is that there's many different Alternative stories as to what happened exactly on that day, and not all CTs believe in all the same theories.

**Conspirasist** · 06-10-2008, 12:17 PM

Now that's really funny because when fox news covered the story,
the coroner was there to and fox news said the coroner was baffled
by the lack of bodies or body parts. He went there to pronounce the
time of death but he couldn't find any bodies.

Now how is it that all of a sudden, there were hundreds of body parts
found all over the place when at the beginning there were none to be
found. Does not make sense at all. Someone has been falsifying records
if you ask me.

I really don't know what happened to those people from flight 93. The
first story to come out was that that flight landed at a cleveland ohio
airport and the people aboard were hauled into the nasa building for
questioning.

The mayor of cleveland held a news press meeting and gave the same
story i just told you. Before the day was over though, the story changed.
The mayor said it was another flight that landed and not flight 93.

It funny to because flight 93 was being reported as having explosives
on-board. I'm sure they had the flight number right if they thought that
explosives were in the plane. How can you mess that up?

Anyway, an odd thing happened later that same day. All records of what
the mayor told the news, mysteriously disappeared. I can't find one thing
about what the mayor first said anywhere online now.

05-12-2008, 01:55 PM	#1 (permalink)
Conspirasist Conspiracy Expert Posts: 258 Rep:	Was 9-11 a scripted event? 9/11 Scripted Demolition Events YouTube - 9/11 Scripted Demolition Events This guy seemed to know how and why the twin towers fell, even before the firemen did. Who is this clown? Anwer: A fake witness. He planted the thought in every americans heads on what made the towers fall. Intense fire and heat! What a bunch of hogwash. Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens YouTube - Fake "Witness" to 9/11 Government Killings Of Its Citizens Missles used to destroy twin towers 911 WTC Evidence 3 Missiles NWO Conspiracy Plane YouTube - 911 WTC Evidence 3 Missiles NWO Conspiracy Plane Missile hits world trade center! YouTube - Missile hits world trade center!

06-10-2008, 06:47 AM	#9 (permalink)
James Lewitzke Administrator Recent Blog Post: Lying Absolutely Kicks Ass! Name: James Posts: 302 Rep:	While there's plenty different theories on what really happened, I think it's unfair to lump every single variation together. For example, Official Story believers will argue something like "You CTer's are whack, Bush didn't take the towers down!", which in their case implies that all Conspiracy Theorists believe Bush was responsible, which is simply untrue. Even if the passengers on the flights were really there, being hijacked, that doesn't mean splinter factions within our government couldn't still be responsible. For all we know, the 19 hijackers could have been government employees themselves, carrying out U.S. orders, and not Bin Laden's. All I'm saying here is that there's many different Alternative stories as to what happened exactly on that day, and not all CTs believe in all the same theories. __________________ Conspiracy-Forums Rules Lightningshock.com - My Blog

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-15-2008, 07:20 PM	#2 (permalink)
Blue Wulf Conspiracy Buff Location: Fox Point Posts: 37 Rep:	I don't think you can script something like that. I mean the passengers on the planes fought back to try to stop them, and unexpected things could happen. So I don't think they can plan a script for it.

05-15-2008, 08:49 PM	#3 (permalink)
Conspirasist Conspiracy Expert Posts: 258 Rep:	You must be referring to the hijacked planes. My view on that is that there never was a hijacking. All the planes involved in the attacks were radio controlled with no passengers aboard. There never were any hijackers either. After 9-11, many of the accused hijackers were seen still alive back in their own country. How do you account for that? One flight that was involved "i think it was flight 93 but not sure" was said to have landed at the cleveland airport in ohio. By the time it landed, the whole airport had been emptied out of people. The people on the flight were taken off the plane and ushered into a nasa building at the airport and that is where the story ends. I can only assume the same thing happened with the other flights if they were in flight at that time. I had read that people believed that building 7 was set up with radio equipment to guide the 2 radio controlled planes into the twin towers but there is no actual proof of that since building 7 was blown up to. If you need further proof 9-11 was a scripted event, go to you-tube and find the video about the BBC news showing a supposed live coverage of building 7 as it fell. It was being reported that building 7 had just fallen but yet it was still there in the video. When the bbc realized they had jumped the gun and building 7 was still there, some how they mysteriously had video feed trouble and had to stop. If that doesnt convince you then i dont know what will. It's already been admitted by government officials that 9-11 was an inside job. I have that posted here to, somewhere.

05-16-2008, 08:27 AM	#4 (permalink)
hamesy Conspiracy Buff Location: England Posts: 42 Rep:	I haven't had chance to look at the videos in the OP, but there are always going to be people that say that the government would never do such a thing. In regards to the passengers fighting back, is there actually any proof that this happened? I'm just wondering that if no proof can be found (I haven't had a look for any as I'm currently at work), then how can people say the passengers fought back? Not sure about building 7, whether if the building contained the radio controllers for the planes, or if it contained the controllers to detonate the towers, but you might want to check out my thread regarding this matter. Who was behind 911?

06-09-2008, 09:02 PM	#6 (permalink)
CrazyPaul Conspiracy Buff Location: California Name: Paul Davis Posts: 26 Rep:	If the planes were "radio controlled" then where are the passengers? Seems like a lot of effort to secretly kidnap people from an airport and send them "somewhere" else to do "something" to them. Especially if your plan calls for them to never be seen from again.... Somehow, I just don't think Bush is smart enough for this one. As to flight 93, a few phone calls will clear up the "confusion" about no body/plane parts. There were plenty, and plenty of people saw them. Seriously, why go through the trouble of "faking" a crash so you can put the bodies back? put the parts of the plane back. fill up a warehouse with plane parts afterward. fill up the morgues. coordinating hundreds of co-conspirators. Seriously, why wouldn't they just be left on the plane? sure as heck would be easier. The only thing more conflicting than government stories is guys saying, "there was no plane", no wait, the "plane was radio controlled". Well, was there a plane or not?

06-09-2008, 10:07 PM	#7 (permalink)
Conspirasist Conspiracy Expert Posts: 258 Rep:	The radio controlled planes are just a theory and there is no proof that it happened that way. If there were radio controlled planes used then the theory is that passengers were put on a different flight that day and the planes used in the attack were radio controlled. The people i said that were never heard from again, may or may not be true. I personally never heard what happened to them but i'm not implying they were killed or anything. They may have just been payed off not to say a word about what happened. Of course bush isn't smart enough to plan something like that but cheney is. It would be great if you could find proof of bodies being found and provide links for us to check out about flight 93. I saw fox news (government owned news) investigating the site after it happened and they were shocked that there were no bodies to be found, anywhere. I never believed the no plane theory. I watched the second one on tv, hit the building.

06-10-2008, 12:17 PM	#10 (permalink)
Conspirasist Conspiracy Expert Posts: 258 Rep:	Now that's really funny because when fox news covered the story, the coroner was there to and fox news said the coroner was baffled by the lack of bodies or body parts. He went there to pronounce the time of death but he couldn't find any bodies. Now how is it that all of a sudden, there were hundreds of body parts found all over the place when at the beginning there were none to be found. Does not make sense at all. Someone has been falsifying records if you ask me. I really don't know what happened to those people from flight 93. The first story to come out was that that flight landed at a cleveland ohio airport and the people aboard were hauled into the nasa building for questioning. The mayor of cleveland held a news press meeting and gave the same story i just told you. Before the day was over though, the story changed. The mayor said it was another flight that landed and not flight 93. It funny to because flight 93 was being reported as having explosives on-board. I'm sure they had the flight number right if they thought that explosives were in the plane. How can you mess that up? Anyway, an odd thing happened later that same day. All records of what the mayor told the news, mysteriously disappeared. I can't find one thing about what the mayor first said anywhere online now.