What if...

[In Lak'esh]

I could prove to you all, beyond a shred of doubt, that 9/11 was a successful false-flag operation? Do you think it's even remotely possible?

IF I said I have irrefutable evidence which proves 9/11 was not how the official conspiracy theory [Osama, hi-jackers, etc.] explains, would you be interested? Would you be willing to take on the subject with an open-mind or would you still take on the status quo a priori [predetermined]? I only ask because I have the information available which should pique your interest. It's just a matter of if the other person participates, understands, and is able to point out that, "hey, something is obviously wrong here with the official account."

"There is nothing to fear except the persistent refusal to find out the truth, the persistent refusal to analyze the causes of happenings." -- Dorothy Thompson

[James Lewitzke]

If you'd like to share that information with the rest of the community, feel more than welcome to.

[In Lak'esh]

I can bring forth the information, Lewitzke, but I do not want to do it via a wall of text. I hope that is understandable, as I don't want to bore you all to death.

For example, if I covered all the details of one major section of the official account, like the NORAD stand-down, there would be about 6 pages full of text on that subject alone. The amount of information available is staggering. Even more shocking is how well this vital information has been suppressed by the media through [instructive] manipulation. Let me give you an example. Has anyone seen The History Channel's airing of the 9/11 Conspiracy? Throughout the whole documentary, when they switched between the two premises, a message would follow. It would read as: "Conspiracy Theorist Claim" vs "Expert". The [new] Popular Mechanics crew were the experts. Now, we all think of Popular Mechanics as a reliable source, right? Well, here's what the don't tell you. In September 2004, Joe Oldham, the magazines former editor-in-chief was replaced by James B. Meigs, who came to PM with a deputy, Jerry Beilinson, from National Geographic Adventure. In October, a new creative director replaced PMs 21-year veteran who was given ninety minutes to clear out of his office.

A former senior editor at PM, who is forbidden from openly discussing the coup at PM, told AFP that the former creative director was abruptly told to leave and given severance pay of two weeks wages for every year spent at PM. Three or four people have been similarly dismissed every month since, he said. He said he was astounded that the coup at PM had not been reported in the mainstream media.

When the new crew was set in place, PM started publishing the 9/11 propaganda. They even wrote a book about it, titled: "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts" The book, who's foreword was written by John McCain, was thoroughly rebutted by Professor David Ray Griffin, in his book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory". Popular Mechanics is yet to follow up with a rebuttal. Popular Mechanics = ab asino lanam [wool from an ass]


Disinformation Galore: controlling mainstream media outlets to promote its version of 9/11

"Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is disinformation and deception," Andreas von B|low, former parliamentary official responsible for the budget for Germany's intelligence agencies, told American Free Press in December 2001.

I'll touch up on the status quo very soon, I hope you all begin understand and participate by pointing out the fallacies. I can only connect to you all through my horrid ramblings. If you have a hard time grasping what I'm saying, ask anything. The truth is the only thing I can offer to you all in the end. Connecting the dots results from an open-mind with a [disgustingly] piqued interest.

dixi,

[Barcs]

I do not think that it's possible to ever prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was an inside job, however that does not mean it wasn't. I've seen people argue back and forth about this until their blue in the face and there is no absolute way to prove either side. I do believe there is MUCH more to 9/11 then we will probably ever know, but there are just too many "coincidences" and inconsistencies for me to believe that it was simply Bin Laden and 19 hijackers. Hell, Bin Laden used to be a CIA asset. Plus the Bushes have so many ties in Saudia Arabia.

[In Lak'esh]

Bin Laden's CIA alias was Tim Osman, actually. I believe there is enough evidence to prove it was a controlled demolition, but this information will never be connected [inside your head] because the populace prefers taking their back-seated emotions [SHOCK & AWE] over general logic [WTC 7, tower collapse broke a law of motion, etc]. Besides, look at who controls the mainstream media. This information will NEVER get the respect it deserves because of the extra-ordinary ways in which the media / populace stifles dissent. All it really takes to stifle dissent is the single uttering of the word "Conspiracy Theorist".

[Blue Wulf]

Ok I would agree with all of you that it is quiet possible that our US government was behind the attack of 9/11, adn even though there may be some proof of this and there are many things to say that it was coincidental I do believe that most americans, especially those who lost someone during the attack will never even listen to you. They are too stung to there emotions and wouldn't be able to believe that the Us government would do such a horrible thing. Personally I believe that the attacks were just a way that Bush could legally go to war. Who would be against getting back at who ever did such a horrible thing? Yet again what do we do when that person is our own president.

[Conspirasist]

It's already been admitted that 9-11 was an inside job.
See my post in the political section "Neocons admit war on terror a hoax".