|
Conspiracy Buff
Posts: 91
Rep: 
|
Again for clarification purposes, the Sixteenth Amendment NULLIFIED the Pollack Case (just as the Fourteenth Amendment NULLIFIED the Dred Scott Case of 1857). Therefore, the amendment enabled Congress to tax the “incomes” of individuals evidenced by the phrase “without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.” Censuses related to numbering individual, natural persons, not corporations. And “no new power” was conferred upon Congress to tax “income” of individuals. The old constitutional power to tax “uniformly” was extended to directly tax the “incomes” of individual people. The people were not taxed; their “incomes” were taxed directly, uniformly and without apportionment.
Now, to the delight of the socialist-communist Jesuit Order, the Congress could tax the incomes of individuals and incomes of corporations in the exact same manner although at different rates. The Sixteenth Amendment was openly intended to tax the “income” of the rich, the millionaires unique to “the Guilded Age.” But the Rockefellers and Morgans were already moving their vast personal fortunes into giant trusts and foundations rendering them immune to the new direct and uniform income tax. Therefore the amendment’s secret but true purpose at the outset was to tax the wages of America’s laborers. For this to finally transpire the Company of Jesus would have to wait another twenty years (1913-1933).
(At this time it is appropriate to expose the many tax experts in the income tax movement. Virtually all of them declare that the Sixteenth Amendment is an excise tax. This is a lie. A direct tax is not an excise tax. They also teach that the Pollack Case, intended to tax the incomes of individual wage-earners, was never NULLIFIED by the Sixteenth Amendment, which is another lie. These notorious liars are men like Irwin Schiff and Aaron Roussu, the late producer of the popular DVD, America: From Freedom to Fascism. It is the position of this author that both men are Jesuit temporal coadjutors intending to incite a tax revolt based on misinformation that will result in a fascist military dictatorship, fully justified in forcefully subduing the coming anarchical revolt.)
6. In October of 1929 three Irish Roman Catholics on the New York Stock Exchange “sold short,” hundreds of margin calls crashing the market. According to Curtis Dahl, FDR’s son-in-law, they were Ben Strong, Tom Bragg and Joseph Kennedy. Hundreds of millions of hard-earned, real dollars had been invested in the market at the behest and encouragement of Dupont multimillionaire, Knight of Malta John J. Raskob. The calculated crash, resulting in the Great Depression, enabled the Jesuits to buy up all bankrupted businesses of interest on Wall Street for pennies on the dollar. The funds came from fascist Mussolini who had given the Vatican nearly 100 million dollars via the Lateran Treaty of March, 1929, as reparations for the loss of the Pope’s Temporal Power from 1870 to 1929. With this backdrop, we can now understand why the Order used its CFR member and 33rd Degree Freemason President Franklin Roosevelt to remove the nation’s gold coins from circulation in 1933 and to institute the Social Security System in 1934 as part of the Black Pope’s socialist “New Deal,” then supported by radio priest, Jew-baiter and Jesuit coadjutor, Charles Coughlin.
7. In 1933 House Joint Resolution was passed as a solution to the Order’s Great Depression. HJR-192 made it illegal to use gold coin as payment for debts. It bankrupted the states, violated Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution (“No state shall make any Thing but gold and silver coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”) and put the entire population in commercial paper. Further, and most importantly for this discussion, it abolished the common law in the States, replacing it with the Uniform Commercial Code. With the loss of the common law in the States, the common law on the federal level also disappeared. In fact, the Supreme Court’s Erie Railroad decision of 1938 (Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 US 64) stated that there was no longer any “federal general common law.” When the removal of gold coin abolished the common law in the States, common law rights were also abolished. One of those common law rights was the common law right to work, to labor. At this moment, the common law right to labor became, by OPERATION OF LAW, the commercial privilege to labor. Americans were now commercial slaves to Washington, D.C., “Rome on the Potomac,” and the Society moved in for mop up operations. Now, with all Fourteenth Amendment citizens in privilege on a state level, the once non-taxable monies received in exchange for our labor, was now “income.”
8. In 1934 the Social Security Act was passed. The beginning of the numbering of the American population began. Each would be assigned a Social Security Number (SSN) with an accompanying bond number to be seen on the reverse of the Social Security Card. All American, laboring, “human resources” would be bonded for the national debt, enslaved to interest payments, which could never be repaid. Like the corporations, all American citizens were now commercial “resources” whose “incomes” were to be taxed and they were to be managed by their 14th Amendment creators in Washington via acts of Congress controlled by Rome through the Archbishop of New York City’s Council on Foreign Relations.
In conclusion, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Sixteenth Amendment and House Joint Resolution 192 working in conjunction with one another, have made the “wages” of the individual American citizen subject to the direct and uniform “income tax.” The Fourteenth Amendment placed the national citizen “in privilege,” no longer enjoying any “fundamental” or “common law” rights—including the Bill of Rights as part of the “privileges and immunities” provision of Fourteenth Amendment citizenship—on a national level. The Sixteenth Amendment imposed an “income tax” on the “incomes” of individual Fourteenth Amendment citizens, but for twenty years (from 1913 to 1933) “income” did not include “wages in exchange for labor” or “personal property.” The Fourteenth Amendment citizen still had the common law right to work on a State level. House Joint Resolution 192 passed in 1933 removed gold coin from circulation on the State level. With the removal of gold from the State level, the common law was removed from the State level. With the common law removed, the COMMON LAW RIGHT TO WORK—by OPERATION OF LAW—became a commercial privilege to work. And therefore, all monies derived from that commercial privilege then became “income.” It is well established that during the 1930s, individual wage earners were filing tax returns and paying the “income tax” on their wages. We read the following statement from federal agent John Roy Carlson’s Under Cover, published in 1943, on page 74:
“The mainspring of Nazi strategy was to keep the masses confused, servile and forever ignorant. That is why my Christian Defender was so successful. My formula was simple. Everything hostile to Nazi aims was called Jewish or Communist and the two made synonymous. I realized how easy it is to become a merchant of hate. Lies. . . .
Although I did my utmost to confine its distribution to those who already were chronic hate mongers, The Christian Defender found its way to Washington. The Sate Department sent me a form to ascertain whether I was an agent of a ‘foreign principal.’ The Treasury Department demanded to know why George Pagnanelli [the alias for John Roy Carlson] hadn’t filed an income tax” [in 1939]. [Emphasis added]
Again we read on pages 182 and 186 we read:
“In the spring of 1941 [before the Order’s planned attack on Pearl Harbor and the Congress’ subsequent declaration of war on Japan in December, 1941, the Victory Tax Act to follow in 1942 falsely claimed by Irwin Schiff to be the beginning of individuals paying an income tax on their wages when it was in fact the beginning of the Rumml Withholding Plan] Hubert [Schmuederrich] insisted that I become acquainted with the prospective members of his underground storm-troopers. . . . Hubert boasted that he never filed an income tax report and was also ‘proud’ of being a draft dodger.”
[Emphasis added]
Clearly, individual wage earners were filing income tax returns in the late Thirties and early Forties before the Victory Tax Act was passed in December, 1942, intended to finance World War II. That Victory Tax was an income tax on wages of the American citizen. It was later repealed in May, 1944, but the withholding of income taxes on wages continued to this day. Therefore, since the Sixteenth Amendment authorized a tax on the “incomes” of individuals without regard to a census, and that wages became “income” via HJR-192, it is no surprise to observe in history that tax returns were being filed by wage earners in the late 1930s before the passage of the Victory Tax Act in 1942. And to instill fear and terror in the populace to “file their returns” in preparation for HJR-192 in 1933, in 1931 Al Capone was tried and convicted of income tax evasion (rather than murder) and sentenced to eleven years in federal prison
|