[In Lak'esh]

Eric John Phelps is currently in a legal battle because he has refused to file a 1040 in twenty five years. Phelps is extremely knowledgeable on the subject of the income tax. His own personal issues reveal the connections linked to his work. He, on a practical and real-life level, is even finding holes in some other "truther" patriots (Aaron Russo) claims about the income tax. Here is what he sent me over half a year ago. A large majority of his claims are backed by damning evidence.

Dear Brethren and Friends,

Due to a cancelled interview on a Swedish radio station today, I felt it necessary to write to the list about my most recent discoveries concerning the Income Tax. I desire to recount its history in light of new understanding. This will cast light on all the disinformation spreading like wildfire throughout the patriot and Bible-believing Christian community, some of which I have believed. As many of you know, I have refused to file a tax return for the last twenty-five years. The reasons are three:

1. There is no Act of law passed by Congress, signed into law by the President and then codified into the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26), which requires an unincorporated, natural person to pay an income tax on his wages received in exchange for labor or intellectual property. (Nearly one trillion Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs or “frauds”) are taken from American laborers every year in “income taxes.” That money is used to pay only the interest on the national debt according to the Grace Commission Report set forth under President Reagan. Head American Knight of Malta J. Peter Grace and JFK co-conspirator/assassin, who chaired that Commission, knew exactly what he was talking about.)

2. According to the rulings of several federal district courts, a “tax return” can be used as evidence against the filer in a criminal prosecution because he has provided all the information on that 1040 "voluntarily." It is for this reason that every IRS commissioner has stated the income tax self-assessment system for individuals is one of "voluntary compliance." We see this term "voluntary compliance" on every IRS 1040 Instruction Pamphlet issued every year. I refuse to voluntarily provide information that may ultimately be used against me in a criminal prosecution.

3. To "voluntarily" provide financial information to the federal government, which information can then be used against the filer in a federal criminal prosecution, is to waive one's Fifth Amendment right. As a Baptist Calvinist, to waive my Fifth Amendment right in any context is to repudiate the work of the Baptist-Calvinists of Virginia, especially Baptist-Calvinist James Madison who penned the Fifth Amendment. The Baptist-Calvinist Fifth Amendment was the means of preventing the Papacy from instituting an American Inquisition via our federal government Rome intended to control from the beginning of our nation’s founding. The First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments are the greatest bulwarks against unbridled reign of the Pope's temporal power over "heretic and liberal" Americans. It is these Amendments that the Order's Patriot Act I has nearly gutted, written from Jesuit Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.---many months before 911! Thus, I refuse to waive my Fifth Amendment right and cannot be compelled to be a witness against myself, especially information provided on a federal income tax return.

To better understand this issue while keeping it simple, I shall recall specific Amendments and Acts of Congress that, when operating together, create the liability for the American laborer to pay an income tax on his wages. This most secretive plan implemented over a period of sixty-five years (1868-1933) is reflective of the diabolical cunning of the Order's greatest Masonic minds working in unison for the destruction of America’s “heretic and liberal” White Anglo Saxon Protestant and Baptist Middle Class, while simultaneously building Rome's Cartel-Corporate-Fascist corporations, most of which do not pay any income tax on their massive profits. Thus, the Order's socialist-communist taxing system (making no distinction between natural and artificial persons---natural persons being living, breathing people and artificial persons being corporations---is returning the world to the Dark Ages. This means we are regressing back to medieval feudalism, when there were: no national sovereignties; no middle class peoples in Europe; no private wealth for the common man; no elective ballot box; corporate monopolies in the hands of blue-blooded, pope-worshipping nobles; no educated and literate populaces; and when the pope was the universal monarch of the world.

1. We shall not address the Income Tax imposed by President Lincoln during the War of Northern Aggression (1861-65). It was repealed in 1864, shortly before the end of that Radical/Black Republican-led, Jacobin socialist-communist, American/French Revolution.

2. On July 28, 1868 (a day of infamy) the Fourteenth Amendment was "declared" to have been ratified. The imposition of that Amendment was the true purpose for inciting and waging the Pope’s Republican-led War/Crusade against the “heretic and liberal” White Southern people regardless of how many Blacks, freed or slave, had to die. It centralized power in Washington, creating a Jesuit “Holy Roman” Empire on the ruins of the destroyed Presbyterian/Baptist-Calvinist Union of Sovereign States. To create a Jesuit-ruled, Masonically-led, centralized empire, national citizenship had to be imposed. This was the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment according to James G. Blaine, "the continental liar from the state of Maine." (Blaine was also a prominent conspirator in the cruel and torturous assassination of the godly, learned and honest President James Garfield which murder occurred in 1881, as shown in VAIII.) The Amendment "reversed the origin and character of American citizenship," making United States citizenship "paramount and dominant," and state citizenship "subordinate and derivative"---state citizenship now being a mere privilege of this newly created national citizenship for both Whites and Blacks. The foundation was now laid for every national citizen of any race to be in commercial privilege while performing his sacred labor for wages.

3. In 1872-73 the Slaughterhouse Cases were decided. Simply put, the "privileges and immunities" of Section One of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment citizenship (the amendment having been forcibly imposed in the Southern States via martial law from 1866 to 1868) did not include "fundamental" or "common law" rights. The Supreme Court held that “fundamental” or "common law" rights were on a state level, not on a federal or national level. (Remember, the American right to work was a common law right secured by the state, not by the federal government.) The blueprint was now set forth in this key Supreme Court decision for the removal of our common law from the state level to be replaced by the Uniform Commercial Code! Once our common law right to work was converted into a commercial privilege to work, the wages from that commercial privilege to work (the “source”) would then be "income." As long as the common law was not overturned on a state level, wages could never be taxed as "income." The distinction between a natural and an artificial person, later set forth by the Supreme Court in Hale v. Henkel (1909) would remain intact.

4. In 1894 the Income Tax Act was passed by Congress. It was a “direct tax” that was “uniform” and not “apportioned.” It taxed the “occupations” of American workers among other things. The law was disobeyed and therefore challenged in court, ultimately decided in 1895 by the Supreme Court. This important case is known as “the Pollack Case” (Pollack v. Farmer’s Loan and Trust Co., 157 US 429, rehearing 158 US 601 (1895)). The decision by the Court was since this direct tax (reported on “a tax return”) was not apportioned, but rather uniform, it was unconstitutional. (According to the Constitution, direct taxes must be “apportioned;” indirect taxes must be “uniform.”)

Now how would the Society of Jesus overcome this decision? How would it be able to put a direct tax without apportionment upon the individual citizens of the Pope’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire? It would take a constitutional amendment.

5. In February of 1913, at the close of the administration of President William Howard Taft, that Skull and Bonesman, 33rd Degree Freemason and slave of the Archbishop of Baltimore James Cardinal Gibbons (as was Taft’s predecessor, 33rd Degree Freemason Theodore “Rex” Roosevelt), the Sixteenth Amendment was declared to have been ratified by Secretary of State and high-level Freemason, Philander Knox. (It has been proven that the amendment was not properly ratified and was recently so admitted by a federal district judge in 2003, but this is not relevant to the discussion at hand.) Assuming that the amendment was properly ratified, according to Black’s Law Dictionary it permitted

“. . . Congress to tax incomes ‘from whatever source derived,’ thus nullifying the Supreme Court’s decisions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co., which had declared that an income tax was a direct tax, which would be constitutionally valid only if apportioned among the States according to population.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th edition, p. 1244.