[In Lak'esh]

An even bigger hole arises in regard to the official account, is the failure to explain, even with all those delays, why did the planes not arrive in time to stop the second attack on the WTC. At 8:52, there were still 11 minutes until 9:03 when Flight 175 would hit the second tower. Lt. Colonel Tim Duffy, a pilot said to have flown one of the F-15s, has been quoted as stating that he “was in full-blower all the way,” which would mean that he was going over 1875nmph. Allowing the standard 2.5 minutes for them to get airborne and up to speed, they should have reached Manhattan in about 8 minutes, having a full 3 minutes left to shoot down the hi-jacked airliner.

Still, the madness continues, as the official account claims the F-15s were still 70 miles away when Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower. Really, now ponder this. According to NORAD's timeline, it took them 19 minutes to reach the city. So, if the story about jets from Otis is true, one can aptly conclude that the jets were flying at a disturbingly low and dubious mph. If NORAD's timeline is accepted, that speed is more like 700 mph. Now I don't have to point out to you all how incredible of a claim it is. I just hope you start to realize just how implausible the official account is.

Also, as a sidenote... Ahmed says an 1,850 nmph “would cover the ground from New Jersey's Air Force Base to New York in under 3 minutes, and thus could have easily intercepted Flight 175.” Even if the second story is accepted, the WTC's second tower should not have been hit. But still, after these great anomalies, we are left with no explanation as to why procedures were not followed in regard to the first attack, second attack, & third attack.

Many critics profess, including myself and some with military experience, think that the second version was fabricated. Stan Goff, a retired Master Sergeant who taught Military Science at West Point concludes that no Air Force jets were scrambled until after the Pentagon was hit. Andreas von Bulow, former State Secretary in the German Defense Ministry, said: “For 60 decisive minutes, the military and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on the ground.” Antaoli Kornukov, the commander in chief of the Russian Air Force, who was quoted the day after 9/11 as saying: “Generally, it is impossible to carry out an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA yesterday.... As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up.” Ahmed comments on the statement: “It is, of course, well known that the US Air Force is far superior to Russia's,” adding that rational infernces can be drawn from these facts. Particularly the attacks on the Twin Towers, which could have happened only if standard operating procedures were suspended.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) were completely and inexplicably dorpped on 11th September—something that had never occured before. The question then remain as to who was responsible for ensuring that routine emergency response rules were not adhered to.

Bykov and Israel comment:

The sabotage of routine protective systems, controlled by strict hierarchies, would never have been contemplated let alone attempted absent the involvment of the supreme US military command. This includes at least US President George Bush, US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumself and the then-Acting Head of Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Genereal Richard B. Myers.

Now we are left with a question to ask. Could a plan to hi-jack airliners and crash them into the WTC have been successful without giving NORAD “stand down” orders? Could these orders have been approved by Rummy / Myers / Cheney / Bush? Really, who cares who approved of the orders. We will never know. The anomalies speak for themselves.

Even more problematic are the questions which have been raised by the collapse of the buildings of the World Trade Center. I will start a new thread for that. The WTC thread will actually have pictures!


I hope you take the time to read through all of this information carefully and with an open mind. The truth is all I want to spread. I hope you start to realize why dissent stifled, not praised, like it should be. 9/11 was the same as 7/7. An inside job. If you've never looked into 7/7, Google it now. I'm sure I could make a thread about that soon. 7/7 was a blatant false-flag terror attack.